The following review contains spoilers for Fringe through the current episode, “The Same Old Story,” originally broadcast September 16, 2008.
When I first heard about Fringe, my interest was centered on the name J.J. Abrams. It never went much beyond that. When I heard descriptions about the kind of show it would be, I would still think, “J.J. Abrams.” I saw more about Fringe, all I thought, it would be something worth having a look at. I mean, “J.J. Abrams.”
So when it came time to actually watching Fringe, I kind of panicked. I let all sorts of excuses get in the way. And when I wrote about it, I wrote, basically, “J.J. Abrams.” It’s time to be a little more fair now, with a second episode aired. The truth is, yeah, I’m not usually the guy watching this kind of show. By “this kind of show,” I mean X-Files. I’ve never seen more than a handful of Twilight Zone episodes, Outer Limits. I don’t read horror fiction, aside from the occasional Stephen King. I’ve read about as many Sandman comics as Twilight Zones. When things get sticky, I get itchy for people to start taking center stage again. I’m just that kind of guy. It’s not that I’m overly concerned with things that go bump in the night. It’s just, I like for there to be a point.
Most times there isn’t. Most times, it’s just to get you to feel something primal, a different kind of porn. The thing about Fringe is, I think it’s that something different. With the second episode, that may be clearer. The “fringe” of the title refers to fringe science, Frankenstein territory here. Walter Bishop, the crazy old man played by John Noble, was very much a Frankenstein figure in the 1970s, before his monster looked him back in the eye. The problem is, the world didn’t wait up for him while he took an extended stay at an asylum. He’s been dragged back in. The world now has people who breed in accelerated life-spans, the fringe science of this episode. In many ways, the way you interpret the events of “The Same Old Story” may define whether or not you choose to find Fringe fascinating or drivel, whether you consider it a worthy addition to this storytelling tradition or a failed J.J. Abrams project.
I choose to consider it a success. There’s a killer on the loose. Walter and his son Peter, played by Joshua Jackson, and their ally, FBI agent Olivia Dunham (Anna Torv), eventually figure out what’s going on, which leads to a final confession from the killer. Does the threat of a prematurely ended life and a father who has created and guided this mess expunge his crimes? I choose to say, it’s a good argument. Such stories are worth exploring, I conclude. And I happen to trust that name, “J.J. Abrams.”
What I said last time, about there being a distinct lineage beyond that name, still holds true. This episode, our merry band, along with Phillip Broyles (Lance Reddick), have now set up briefings familiar to fans of Alias. In fact, if you don’t look too closely, it’s not hard to imagine Broyles as a descendent of Dixon, or Walter of Arvin Sloane (or Hugo Reyes, for that matter), Dunham of Sydney Bristow, complete with her own Danny, right from the start.
Still, there’s something to be said about feeling giddy, that I get to experience another J.J. Abrams from the start. Chris Carter started right in with X-Files. He hasn’t really done much since (Millennium? Lone Gunmen?), much less looked beyond that original creation. Abrams, he’s done Alias, he gave us Lost. Now there’s Fringe. I think I’m ready now.
September 18th, 2008 at 9:27 pm
First, I really miss The Lone Gunmen. Second, I think you are giving J.J. Abrams just a little bit too much credit. With Lost especially, his involvement ended rather quickly. I believe, and Lostpedia backs me up here, he has not done all that much since the first season. Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse have been responsible for the bulk of what has made Lost so great (and, at times, so disappointing).
And if I am not mistaken, Abrams left Felicity to create Alias. So that is two shows he has created and then abandoned (and Abrams actually did not create Lost). Which is not to say he does not deserve praise for the work he has done, or acclaim for all of his shows to date. I do wonder how long it will be before he comes up with another concept and heads off to, once again, make the next “big” thing. What will happen to Fringe then?
September 19th, 2008 at 5:15 pm
First, yeah I know he technically didn't create Lost. He was handed the idea of a fictional Survivor. But he's the one that came up with what we know. Once he got the team assembled, he did eventually leave. I don't know that much about Felicity. Never watched it. Had this second episode not turned out so reasonably well, I was prepared to compare Anna Torv to Keri Russell, the appeal of whom I've never understood (my experience with her derives from Mission: Impossible III, and she seemed pretty darn generic to me).
The thing is, when J.J. Abrams is associated with something, it makes a difference. Cloverfield was known as his project, even though he only produced it. Alias is his baby, the one he did start to finish. You can't deny he's the first name most people thought of during the first season of Lost, then Lindelof, then a few other guys. Maybe it's just how I've been following his career personally, but that's the most of what Fringe meant to me when I first heard of it. The media was the same way, but you know it was mostly thinking of Lost, maybe even Cloverfieldd, the new Star Trek movie. I happen to know him best from Alias. And that's what's most clear about Fringe, that this guy J.J. is well-known, and happened to do this other show that's similar in a lot of ways. Fringe distinguishes itself, rises or falls, based on its ability to both live up to the Abrams past as break away from it. At least for me.
January 21st, 2010 at 6:13 am
exemplary work. You have gained a new subscriber. I hope you can keep up the good work and I look forward to more of your interesting posts.
January 21st, 2010 at 2:46 pm
Nice one, there is actually some great facts on this post some of my readers may find this relevant, will send a link, thanks.