<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lower Decks &#187; Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lowerdecks.com/category/television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com</link>
	<description>Where everyday fans of science fiction, fantasy and horror gather to discuss their favorite television shows, movies and comics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 01:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Deconstructing Lost</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/10/18/deconstructing-lost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/10/18/deconstructing-lost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Waterloo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Related]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been watching TV shows created or co-created by J.J. Abrams for the last decade now, beginning with ‘Alias’ and now continuing through ‘Fringe.’ Undeniably, his biggest success to date has been ‘Lost,’ which at first glance doesn’t seem to have a whole lot in common with the other two shows I’ve just mentioned. There’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been watching TV shows created or co-created by J.J. Abrams for the last decade now, beginning with ‘Alias’ and now continuing through ‘Fringe.’  Undeniably, his biggest success to date has been ‘Lost,’ which at first glance doesn’t seem to have a whole lot in common with the other two shows I’ve just mentioned.  There’s a key difference, and it begins right in the pilot.  Common lore has it that Abrams intended for Jack Shephard to die.  With that crucial difference, ‘Lost’ was given a significant nudge in its own direction, and so in that spirit, I’m going to take another look at the series while it’s still fresh in everyone’s memories.</p>
<p><span id="more-2943"></span></p>
<p>In the pilot of ‘Alias,’ CIA agent Sydney Bristow (Jennifer Garner) loses the love of her life.  In the pilot of ‘Fringe,’ FBI agent Olivia Dunham (Anna Torv) loses the love of her life.  Now, obviously, Kate Austen (Evangeline Lilly) isn’t any kind of government agent (quite the opposite, actually), and in the pilot of ‘Lost,’ she’s only just met Jack (Matthew Fox).  Yet in all three instances, J.J. Abrams fully intended for the central characters to be strong females who lose, at least in the latter cases, what appear to audiences to be equally strong males.  A crucial difference to ‘Lost’ is that it was not originally created by Abrams, but was rather a project he was called into fix.  He quickly set about much the same course that usually interests him (‘Undercovers’ from this fall represents another trend I’ll get back to shortly), which even his two most prominent feature films follow, to a certain degree (with male protagonists substituting for a more traditional medium, in ‘Mission: Impossible III’ and ‘Star Trek’).  It’s fair to say that if circumstances had been different, his original decision to kill off Jack would have stood.</p>
<p>Working in closer collaboration with others, he decided against his usual instinct.  But what would ‘Lost’ have been like had Jack not survived?  To put it bluntly, Sawyer (Josh Holloway) would have been a whole lot more lucky.  In ‘Alias,’ Sydney quickly struck up a relationship with Michael Vaughn (Michael Vartan), the man who helped her navigate between operations for the CIA and SD-6, an organization steeped in conspiracy.  In ‘Fringe,’ Dunham quickly established a unique rapport with Peter Bishop (Joshua Jackson), the man who helped her navigate between operations for the FBI and Fringe Division, a unit specifically set up to explore an emerging conspiracy.  And with Sawyer?  What’ve you got on ‘Lost’ that would sound similar to the arcs of the other two shows?  Kate would grow closer to him while navigating basic survival and the emerging reality of the Dharma Initiative and the conspiracy on the island.  One could easily imagine Kate and Sawyer getting pretty comfortable inside that hatch.</p>
<p>In ‘Alias’ and ‘Fringe,’ there are father figures and family histories that cause a lot of headaches.  Between Jack Bristow and Walter Bishop, there’s enough drama as it is, but they come packaged with a lot of baggage.  ‘Lost’ became known for all of that and more, with a constant stream of explorations for every character.  Jack threw off a lot of the balance by surviving past the pilot.  As a more traditional lead character, he took on a heavy load of backstory, right from the start, leaving Kate to seem a little less trustworthy in comparison.  There was hardly any sympathy in her story, not even when the worst thing she ever did was finally explained in the second season.  It’s true that after Jack, Kate got the most face-time in the flashbacks, but it was tough competition, and she couldn’t help but lose.</p>
<p>Now imagine that Jack weren’t in the picture, if the whole show basically revolved around Kate.  In the present, on the island, hardly anyone garnered as much sympathy as the easily likable Kate.  It was basically Jack who exposed her secret in the first place.  What if it had been Sawyer?  With Jack around, Sawyer couldn’t be much more than the anti-hero, but in his first big episode, it’s still Kate who makes the first real emotional connection with him.  No surprise, right?  Without Jack, that’s what the story would have been, Kate exposing Sawyer for the good person he essentially is, and Sawyer making Kate’s past seem better than it actually was.  </p>
<p>Imagine Sawyer and Kate running the show.  Half of what Locke had to do was necessary because Jack would never be rebellious enough to do half the things Locke did.  If you stop to think about it, a lot of Locke’s frustrations came from having to do things other people weren’t willing to do, which is exactly what Jack as the leader of the crash survivors forced him to continue doing, even as he struggled to find a new spiritual significance, his connection to the island.  Kate, along with Sawyer actively supporting her, and seeking answers to her own troubled past (imagine a ghostly Jack guiding her along, as Jack’s father Christian did for him instead), stumbles into the hatch, and perhaps a more active residual presence of the Dharma Initiative.  Again, with Jack around, constantly questioning everything, a cooperative Desmond was not at all necessary.  Complications only bred more complications on ‘Lost,’ challenges worthy of a more traditional hero.</p>
<p>In ‘Alias,’ Sydney was always running into problems, but the challenge was always to introduce twists that she couldn’t anticipate.  The biggest one of the series was the big reveal about her mother.  The second biggest nearly derailed the show, when she lost three years of memory and had to figure out what had happened during that time.  In ‘Fringe,’ Abrams had refined his interests, and learned from prior experiences, to more deliberately layer the intrigue, leaving much of it right in front of the audience the whole time, with answers revealed in stages.  Peter Bishop, after all, became the key to the alternate realities, and his father Walter the man behind much of the weird science investigated on a weekly basis.  John Scott (Mark Valley), meanwhile, the lost love killed off in the pilot, was purposefully set up as a red herring, a twist between ‘Alias’ and the original intentions for ‘Lost,’ but perhaps owing most of all to the revisions of the Michael Vaughn character in the later seasons of ‘Alias.’  </p>
<p>Kate had no obvious qualifications for surviving on the island, other than her instincts, which she’d been relying on for years while she was on the lam.  It was still more than Jack had, and yet he was always in charge, simply because he had leadership skills.  Sydney Bristow and Olivia Dunham both came to rely on male counterparts, and that would have been Sawyer for Kate.  He didn’t lack leadership potential.  He lacked a basic sense of tact, and the fact that Jack was always there to provide a different example, a better one, to follow.</p>
<p>‘Lost’ itself tried to demonstrate what it would have been like to follow someone less virtuous than Jack, when it tracked the fate of the tail section survivors in the second season.  None of those characters ever came to quite the same amount of depth established for Kate and Sawyer in the first season, but even what we did see, and for Ana-Lucia and Mr. Eko, there was plenty, was never very convincing.  They had basic character flaws to overcome, not tragic circumstances.  I wouldn’t for a moment imagine that Kate and Sawyer would have led the survivors to the same kind of vulnerability and ruin, and I’m not suggesting the Tailies were meant to represent what the show might have become without Jack.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t even begin to suggest that the show would be substantially different in its outcome in these altered circumstances.  I would suggest that ‘Lost’ explored a lot more of its potential than ‘Alias’ did (which is something ‘Fringe’ has also sought to do).  What Abrams learned on ‘Lost’ was to switch up his instincts.  ‘Undercovers’ obviously represents an attempt to replicate ‘Alias,’ but without all the melodrama, and one of the basic signs of this is that the lead characters are happily married, and both still alive by the end of the pilot.  It’s another step beyond ‘Fringe,’ in that regard, lessons learned and other possibilities explored.  It might be said that a lot of what Abrams does is explore the possibilities represented by a singular kind of experience.  ‘Lost’ helped motivate that in a number of unusual ways.  While he was famous before it, and is basically the reason he was given the opportunity to work on it at all, Abrams shot into a completely different orbit after ‘Lost.’  </p>
<p>Therefore, examining it through comparison is extremely useful.  Imagine for yourself what it might have been, with that small difference, Jack dying in the pilot, and Kate as the de facto lead character.  A lot of things would still be different about it, a far larger cast to juggle and account for, but when you look at ‘Lost’ this way, you begin to realize the ways it essentially remains very similar to the other work of J.J. Abrams.  Instead of a vast and confusing mystique, a show that seems unlike any other show you’ve seen before, and therefore subject to a completely different set of criteria for analysis, and so easy to dismiss as convoluted if it occurs to you to reach such a conclusion, you can return the focus back to where it all began, with the characters, and whatever weird things might happen to them in a given set of circumstances.  </p>
<p>Whether it’s Kate or Jack, the mystery was always the island, and the way it developed connections in the most unexpected places.  How any one life revolved around such a story, that’s what was always so compelling about ‘Lost.’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/10/18/deconstructing-lost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fringe 3&#215;1 &#8220;Olivia&#8221; review</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/09/24/fringe-3x1-olivia-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/09/24/fringe-3x1-olivia-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Waterloo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fringe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contains spoilers through “Olivia,” originally broadcast 9/23/10. At this point, I’ve got to feel a little gratified, because show I like has managed to make it to a third season. Granted, I know that a lot of shows like that have lasted as long, a little longer, and I still feel a little cheated, for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Contains spoilers through “Olivia,” originally broadcast 9/23/10.</strong></p>
<p>At this point, I’ve got to feel a little gratified, because  show I like has managed to make it to a third season.  Granted, I know that a lot of shows like that have lasted as long, a little longer, and I still feel a little cheated, for one reason or another, but with ‘Fringe,’ something strange and wonderful has happened.  All the potential I saw in the beginning, gradually, critics and audiences have come to embrace as well.  The world is beginning to understand that this thing is fascinating.  The third season looks like it’s only going to grow more fascinating still.</p>
<p><span id="more-2930"></span></p>
<p>When we left off last season, we had finally made the momentous trip “over there,” the alternate reality Walter Bishop (John Noble) once visited when he realized he could have a second chance at saving the life of his son, Peter (Joshua Jackson).  Much of this backstory is reiterated via clips to open the season premiere, so if you were a little fuzzy on that, it’s okay.  But the real problem, and what occupies most of the episode, is that when our characters made that that trip, Olivia Dunham (Anna Torv) was kidnapped and replaced by her double.  When Peter went back home, he inadvertently celebrated with the wrong Dunham.</p>
<p>There’s a few scenes with Peter and Bolivia (as the alternate Olivia is apparently being referred to, off-camera, just as alternate Walter, on-camera, is distinguished as Walternate, which Peter himself references during a debriefing), but mostly, “Olivia” is all about Olivia, stuck in the alternate reality, setting up the working points of the season, or at least the starting points.</p>
<p>What’s immediately fascinating about the setup is that until now, I hadn’t realized how closely it resembles how the third seasons of ‘Alias’ and ‘Lost,’ two other shows begun by J.J. Abrams (which I often reference in these reviews, as counterpoint) started out so similarly.  You’ll recall that in ‘Alias,’ Sydney Bristow had woken up in Hong Kong, her memory and a significant period missing from her life.  It was the first unpopular move the series made, and in a sense, it never fully recovered from it.  In ‘Lost,’ Jack, Sawyer, and Kate all became hostages of the Others, a situation that contributed in making that season the most consistently uncomfortable and unpopular year of the show, which like the same season in ‘Alias’ almost torpedoed all interest in it.</p>
<p>I don’t mention these facts to suggest ‘Fringe’ has done something similar and will suffer a similar fate (though it’s certainly possible), but again, for contrast.  Unlike the other shows, Olivia seems to gain a certain measure of power within the first episode, a sense of control, which even if undermined by the end of it, still gives a measure of satisfaction to the viewer.  She is not completely powerless; her undoing is deliberate and adequately explained, and helps set up more and perhaps more interesting developments for later episodes.  That Walternate has her conditioned to believe that she is actually the Olivia that is indigenous to the alternate reality is pretty fascinating, like the Mirror Universe episodes from Star Trek, when we could follow two different versions of the same character simultaneously, but with the added complication that even the constant, the personality we’re supposed to know, won’t be acting that way.  It’s all about sympathy.  As long as audiences can keep it straight, they’re be rooting for the “right” Olivia, right from the start.  They’ll be looking for the moment that she breaks free from the control she’s been put under, because in essence, they’ve seen her do it once already, no matter what the facts may suggest to Walternate and his cronies.</p>
<p>While she’s fighting it here, we already get some extraordinary moments.  Olivia has a knack for making the right connections at the right times (as she did last season with Sam Weiss, played by Kevin Corrigan, who will be returning this season), and she does that again during this episode.  While she’s briefly on the run and in full command of her faculties, she runs into a cabbie who ends up being the audience surrogate, the character who will make it easy for new viewers to understand what’s going on, and old ones to build the needed sympathy that will sustain her in later episodes.  Olivia uses some strong tactics on him early on, but gradually builds some real trust, so that eventually, the cabbie realizes that he knows exactly what she’s going through.  She ends up not needing the leverage she’s been holding against him to earn his continued cooperation.  As a one-off character, the cabbie, played by a familiar genre veteran, Andre Royo, last seen in ‘Heroes’ (the “villain” who could create miniature black holes), and lends a lot of his backstory from vague illusions to that past performance, is spot-on.</p>
<p>The alternate Charlie Francis (the one that’s still alive), is given a lot more sympathy during this episode than his appearance at the end of last season as well, another clear as to how navigating this season is going to work.  We also meet Olivia’s mother, Marilyn (Amy Madigan), who in our reality is dead, but in the alternate reality is alive and kicking, and inadvertently helps put Olivia back into the hands of Walternate.  But there are signs that she may hold the key to Olivia’s salvation.</p>
<p>Speaking of salvation, viewers from last season really should have guessed it all along, but those who had been hoping for some swift and handy resolution to Olivia’s situation probably spent the whole episode expecting that she’s made a quick trip back home, only to discover that, for all intents and purposes, she’s stuck there.  We’ve known it isn’t a simple matter to cross between realities, but basic instinctual hope, and a need for the status quo (which both ‘Alias’ and ‘Lost,’ as I’ve suggested, both unsuccessfully exploited) made some viewers hope against the facts.  But ‘Fringe’ has a chance of making this familiar gambit succeed, because in essence, it’s got two versions of more or less the same reality going on, the same characters, the same actors.  To create some differences that don’t have to do with temperament and visuals, some new characters have been introduced, including Marilyn Dunham.  But Charlie has a new partner, Lincoln Lee, who happens to be portrayed by one of two brothers cast for the season, Shawn and Aaron Ashmore, who introduce a whole new level of duplication to matters.  Lincoln has been badly scarred, leaving him pretty distinctive, so rather than a nice set of twins, right there in the alternate reality, there’s a problem of fractured facades, complications that need to be worked out.</p>
<p>“Olivia,” to my mind, is a terrific way to start out the third season, clearly echoing history while also making history work for it, in a strong and confident way, much as the series has been progressing from the start, always keenly aware of what it’s trying to do, and attempting to make it as interesting as possible.  ‘Fringe’ is not a show like ‘Alias’ or ‘Lost,’ where there’s a single story that weaves through the back- and foreground, moving in an obvious direction.  It’s been working twists and turns, gradual and deliberate revelations all along, combining what worked well for both its immediate predecessors, and potentially creating something that could exceed them.  A lot of that potential became more obvious in the second half of last season, and it appears that the third season hasn’t slacked off from the increased momentum.  We’re up for a pretty interesting ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/09/24/fringe-3x1-olivia-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost &#8220;The End&#8221; review</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/25/lost-the-end-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/25/lost-the-end-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Waterloo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How I Got These Scars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before anyone knew it for certain, ‘Heroes’ completed its run pretty much as it had started out, and at pretty much the same point everyone last cared about it: Claire, the cheerleader, trying to kill herself, but because she obviously couldn’t, it was all about the meaning of the act. The first time, it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before anyone knew it for certain, ‘Heroes’ completed its run pretty much as it had started out, and at pretty much the same point everyone last cared about it: Claire, the cheerleader, trying to kill herself, but because she obviously couldn’t, it was all about the meaning of the act.  The first time, it was about exploring her, well, brave new world.  The second time, it was about letting the rest of the world do it with her.  ‘Lost,’ it turns out, pretty much went the same way, except, ‘Lost’ being ‘Lost,’ if the people who last watched the show the last time everyone really liked it, right around the start of the second season, probably came away with the final episode a lot different than those who watched it from start to finish.  Think about it: who wouldn’t have expected Jack and Locke, as they did in one of many climactic moments during “The End,” to come to epic blows?  Jack and Sawyer had finally done it in the fifth season finale.  If Locke were still alive, it might not really have been out of the question.  But yes, ‘Lost’ was ‘Lost,’ straight to the end.</p>
<p><span id="more-2832"></span></p>
<p>I tried for years to understand what kind of writer I am.  I knew from early childhood that I was destined in some sense to be a storyteller, but it wasn’t until years later, when I took my first stabs at writing long fiction, that I wrote best and most easily when I focus most of it on reflective thinking.  This was a problem, I realized, because very few people write that way.  Except on television (and in my favorites, film, which might explain why my favorites look so different from a lot of other people’s).  I had been a fan of Star Trek for most of my life, but my favorite series grew to be ‘Deep Space Nine’ and ‘Enterprise,’ both of which drew heavily on their backstories.  ‘Andromeda,’ a show that never quite reached the levels Kevin Sorbo had previously experienced in fan communities as his ‘Hercules,’ was at its best when its characters looked back as they fought onward.  I’m not talking about impersonal events, the kind that littered ‘Babylon Five’ or ‘Battlestar Galactica’ (arguably, though as I’ve talked about in HYGOTS both shows had their merits I would come to admire), but what weighed heavily on the minds of ‘Dark Angel,’ ‘Boomtown,’ ‘Defying Gravity.’  ‘Fringe’ is one of the most heavily-laden reflection shows I’ve ever watched.  ‘Heroes,’ when I finally gave it another chance, turned out to be one, too.  ‘How I Met Your Mother’ is all about it, too.  ‘Prison Break’ had the specter of the past hanging over its present perils.</p>
<p>But ‘Lost’ spent its entire run exploring a massive cast of characters, right to the end, and that’s what ultimately defines that conclusion, beyond all wildest expectations.</p>
<p>You might almost have seen it coming, when earlier in the season the flash-sideways, the glimpses into the lives of the castaways if “the Incident” never happened and Oceanic Flight 815 actually landed at LAX, with the island sunk on the bottom of the ocean.  After all, Smokey/Man in Black/Locke Monster/Adam made it clear during the final episode that he meant to escape by destroying the island, a plan Desmond helped to facilitate after he was lowered by Jack &amp; Locke into the cave of light at the center of the island (not far from where Jack first woke up at the start of the pilot) and essentially unplugged it.  Before Christian showed up at his own funeral and revealed to Jack and the audience that the flash-sideways represented the afterlife, it was confusing enough that these side stories were being told at all, that everyone had been reset back to the first episode but still looked like they did in the present (notably Jack, anyway), how it meant anything at all.  But “The End,” in the end, was more about this apparent tangent than the final moments of island life.</p>
<p>Here’s a very rough version of the finale: Jack, having become the new Jacob, becomes the primary target of the Man in Black, but everything converges in two events, the trip to the cave and the launch of the Ajira plane.  Jack and Man in Black have it out, but not before Jack replaces himself with Hurley, because he realizes his purpose was to save the island, not be its guardian.  Hurley was always the far better companion everyone could count on, and Ben turned out to find his redemption in finally trusting someone else, becoming the new Richard Alpert.  Alpert, meanwhile, leaves the island, along with Lapidus,  Kate, Sawyer, Claire, and Miles.  Desmond is sent back home, too, having completed his own journey.  In the sideways, all the characters complete converging on each other, first for a concert, and then for a funeral, and finally to move on.</p>
<p>What ‘Lost’ ultimately accomplishes is completing the story of its characters as they find themselves; the island really is basically a metaphor, because it is through the experience of coming to this island and everything that happens to them because of it that allows them to finally accept themselves, and find acceptance in others, which is the note “The End” ends on.</p>
<p>“The End” resonates beyond just being the final episode of a series I have grown to admire greatly, one that ranks among the great conclusions.  I thought at one point about another Star Trek, ‘Generations,’ a movie that struggles to define the meaning of the Nexus, an energy ribbon that floats through space and occasionally transports people into their own private dreams, their own afterlives that allow them to exist in their perfect realities.  On its own, “The End” is like a revision of that film, of just how much work really would have been necessary for audiences to accept everything it attempted to do.  </p>
<p>“The End” helps complete the ‘Lost’ saga, in the same way revealing Darth Vader to have once been Anakin Skywalker redefined just what exactly the Star Wars films were all about.  ‘Lost’ famously made a lot of references to books and movies, and Star Wars was one of favorites to draw on (Hurley, in this episode, even gets to say “I have a bad feeling about this”).  For anyone still wondering whether flashbacks, flashforwards, and flash-sideways were really necessary, there’s your answer.  It was always about the characters, not the mysteries.  “Across the Sea,” two episodes ago, spelled everything still essentially necessary out, as far as what everyone watching for that reason.  “The End” was another version of the second season finale, just as the fifth season finale was, for that viewer.</p>
<p>“The End” was like Neo realizing at the end of ‘The Matrix Revolutions’ that his story wasn’t about waking everyone up, but getting everyone to be comfortable with their own versions of reality.  All those gathered in the church had grown comfortable, hadn’t been stuck on the island, as Michael was, or presumably, even Mr. Eko, other familiar faces we didn’t reunite with.  If there was any disappointment during the two and half hours, it was that we didn’t get to see everyone again.  Because anyone who had been watching from the start, and who kept watching, couldn’t help but appreciate how it ended with Jack, lying back down, closing that solitary eye.</p>
<p>Alpert realizing that he’s aging again, Vincent lying down with Jack, Rose &amp; Bernard sticking to their guns, Jack standing up like Locke at the end of “Walkabout,” the calm inevitability of the episode, Shannon showing up and demonstrating that Sayid’s happy ending wasn’t with Nadia after all, “I’ll see you in another life, brother,” corking the island, all of these were nice touches.</p>
<p>It was the first season finale that didn’t feel frantic; everyone and everything was busy converging throughout the episode.  Everything felt right.  If you thought some characters had some uneventful final arcs on the island, they were better served in the sideways.  I won’t go into what specific characters did; I suspect that’ll be talked about elsewhere.</p>
<p>The night itself was pretty awesome.  ABC spent the first two hours recapping the entire series.  Target had some pretty clever commercials, including a smoke detector for the Smoke Monster.  An hour after it ended, many of the cast members reunited with Jimmy Kimmel.  Because I’m a fan of ‘Survivor,’ it felt to me exactly like the reunion shows that round out each of those seasons (one of three gag “alternate endings” even included Jeff Probst, which of course I thought was genius).  It was great just to spend some time with these actors, and Kimmel was a genial host, probably the only person who could have done it with just the right tone.</p>
<p>“The End,” as I’ve said, is one of my favorite series finales.  It reminded me of “What You Leave Behind,” the last episode of ‘DS9,’ which also asked its audience to embrace some bigger thoughts and broader ways of saying goodbye than is typical (but among the best things ‘BSG’ did was its own conclusion, “Daybreak,” which took exactly the large view I was always hoping for).  It was the best way to end what was arguably a perfect television experience, at least in my view, something that, as many have already said, will be nearly impossible to duplicate.  It was the most reflection possible in a series that had already staked most of its existence on reflection, pulling a fast one that inverted all expectations but was the most obvious and appropriate, at least in hindsight, move possible.</p>
<p>Now really, what more could you possibly ask for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/25/lost-the-end-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOST &#8211; 6&#215;17/18 &#8211; &#8220;The End&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/25/lost-6x1718-the-end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/25/lost-6x1718-the-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 04:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about the LOST finale, and the opinions seem to be split.  Some people loved it, seeing it as the perfect culmination of six years of storytelling.  Some people didn&#8217;t love it, as it didn&#8217;t explain some of the questions that were eating at people since the show began.  And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about the <em>LOST </em>finale, and the opinions seem to be split.  Some people loved it, seeing it as the perfect culmination of six years of storytelling.  Some people didn&#8217;t love it, as it didn&#8217;t explain some of the questions that were eating at people since the show began.  And I won&#8217;t make you jump to know my opinion &#8211; I loved it, and I&#8217;m very happy to explain why I loved it.  But I think your opinion of the finale is going to be solely dependent on what show you were watching.  And, oddly enough, it seemed that there were to sets of <em>LOST </em>fans out there.  Which one are you?</p>
<p><span id="more-2827"></span><em>LOST </em>began with a simple premise.  A group of people crash on an Island and are forced to survive.  I remember the first time the I read an article on the show, and it sounded so interesting.  And one of the things that made it interesting was the fact that this wasn&#8217;t an ordinary Island.  There was a polar bear on a tropical Island, and a man who found his paralyzed body instantly healed.  And don&#8217;t forget about that spooky monster with the mechanical noises.  And as the show evolved, we learned more about the mysterious Others, the haunted numbers, and dozens of other Island mysteries.</p>
<p>And the mysteries were the icing on the cake.  They were the part that got people talking, got people thinking, and got people to pass the show around.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; <em>LOST </em>isn&#8217;t the show it is without the mysteries and the mythology.</p>
<p>But it was just the icing.  The substance part of the cake were the characters, and it was like that from day one.  While the mystery of the Island would come and go, episode to episode, the show was trying to train you to care about the people.  Not every episode dealt with the Monster or the Others, but every episode featured a flashback.  Every episode dealt with one of our characters, telling us who these people are and what led them to the Island.</p>
<p>It seemed like it was simple enough &#8211; the flashback would usually tie into the character&#8217;s current predicament.  Charlie&#8217;s failed relationship with a woman would deal with his current status with Claire.  Jack&#8217;s inability to let go of something connected with his inability to let Boone die.  Sawyer&#8217;s troubled past was connected with his inability to let anyone close to him.</p>
<p>But this season let us know something else.  We got three years of flashbacks to teach us how flawed these people were, and how much they needed the Island.  They were all scared, all damaged, and all alone.  John Locke repeatedly told them that they were brought to the Island for a reason, but none of them realized that they were all the same.  Only the fans, who could put their stories side by side, could see the connections they all had to each other.</p>
<p>And it made the show so rich!  You would see characters from one flashback (say, Nadia) appear in someone else&#8217;s flashback (she appeared in a Charlie flashback and a Locke one), and it would make you smile.  The show wouldn&#8217;t come out and say it &#8211; it would just let you see it.  If you got it, you got it.  If not, it was no big deal.</p>
<p>And the flash sideways became one big Easter egg.  The finale reveals that the flash sideways was created by the survivors so that they could be together again.  Call it Heaven.  Call it Purgatory.  Call it a bubble universe.  Call it the afterlife.  Call it whatever you want because the show makes no statement about anyone&#8217;s beliefs (the stained-glass window in the church was evidence of this).  Whatever you believe is okay, and you can find a way to make it fit.</p>
<p>For the whole season, we&#8217;ve been debating on what the flash sideways meant.  We thought that there was a chance that the two universes would meet &#8211; that perhaps one Locke could defeat the other.  Or maybe everyone would get the choice between living in one world or the other.  Would Jack decide to live as Jacob or as a father to David?</p>
<p>Instead, the flash sideways universe showed us the true souls of these people and what they wanted to be.  Kate Austen spent her life trying to rationalize what she&#8217;d done to get herself in all that trouble, and yet in the flash sideways, she continually proclaimed her innocence.  Sawyer saw himself as a good guy who made the wrong choices &#8211; so this time, he made the choice to do things on the right side of the law.  Jin and Sun went from a loveless marriage to a uncommitted relationship full of love.</p>
<p>And Jack Shephard, the cowboy with all the daddy issues, got to prove his own worth as a father.  After alienating his own son for most of the boy&#8217;s life, Jack does whatever it takes to make his son believe in him.  And by being a father to David, Jack was able to exorcise all of the demons brought on by his own father.</p>
<p>And none of this is possible if we didn&#8217;t know these characters as well as we did.  As well as we do.  We wouldn&#8217;t recognize the subtle changes, and we wouldn&#8217;t have teared up at the sight of all the reunions.</p>
<p>Looking at the two and a half hours as a whole, it&#8217;s pretty simple to see why some people loved the finale more than others.  If you wanted answers in the finale, you weren&#8217;t going to get any.  The biggest question that was answered was &#8220;what is the significance of the flash sideways universe?&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you want to know more about Jacob?  Sorry, he didn&#8217;t appear.  Want to know more about his Monster?  Unfortunately, he&#8217;s still nameless.  What about that mysterious light?  It&#8217;s still as mysterious as when we first saw it.</p>
<p>In a lot of ways, the &#8220;mythology finale&#8221; was &#8220;Across the Sea.&#8221;  Outside of a few words from Jacob in &#8220;What They Died For&#8221;, there weren&#8217;t really any answers to go around.  This finale was about closing the book on the characters, and that&#8217;s really what I tuned in for.</p>
<p>Did I want some answers?  Sure.  But knowing that Locke was able to find redemption in the afterlife was much more important than finding out the Monster&#8217;s true name.  Seeing Claire and Charlie reunite was much more important than finding out why the Dharma food drops were still coming after all these years.  And, honestly, seeing Christian at the church was more important than seeing Walt.</p>
<p>But, at the end of the day, there will always be more questions.  This show proved that you only bring up more questions when you answer one.  Remember when our biggest concern was finding out what the Others were all about?  Remember when we had no idea what the Monster even looked like?  Remember when we had no idea who the French woman was?</p>
<p>Last night, there were two Others in the main cast (Ben and Richard).  Not only was the Monster in the main cast, we got to meet him in his very own flashback.  And the French woman died so long ago that it was a treat to finally see her last episode.</p>
<p>And we kept looking for answers from people.  We all remember what it felt like when they had Ethan cornered in season one.  This was one of the Others, and we were all so furious with Charlie for killing him before we got anything from him.</p>
<p>Then came Henry Gale.  The writers tortured us with the question of whether or not he was &#8220;one of them.&#8221;  And when he finally revealed his true nature, he spoke in mysterious riddles to the point where we never really understood.  And when season three shed light on Ben&#8217;s real identity, we realized that he didn&#8217;t really know that much in the first place.</p>
<p>As soon as we learned that, there was Richard Alpert.  The man seemed to be ageless, and he was an Other when Ben Linus was just a kid.  Surely, when his brain was properly picked, we would get all the answers we were seeking.  And, yet, we finally get a flashback of Richard, and it turns out that he was just a laborer who ended up on the Island by mistake.  Sure, he&#8217;d seen a lot, but he didn&#8217;t have the answers we were desperately seeking.</p>
<p>But there was Jacob.  The man behind the Others who we didn&#8217;t meet until the season five finale &#8211; even his death in that episode couldn&#8217;t keep us from the answers.  But just like Ethan got his answers from Ben, Ben got his answers from Richard, and Richard got his answers from Jacob &#8211; Jacob only received his answers from the mysterious &#8220;Mother&#8221; character played by Allison Janney in &#8220;Across the Sea.&#8221;</p>
<p>Every question raises a new one.  Ethan to Mother, the answers always came from somewhere else.  And I think that was the point.  If we were given a flashback of Mother, it would have been the same thing.  Maybe we would meet her Father, who simply got answers from someone else.  It would take flashing back all the way to the beginning of the Island to get the true answer.</p>
<p>And, honestly, that answer probably would have been &#8211; &#8220;This is a very powerful light.  I must protect it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because at the end of the day, that&#8217;s all it is.  It&#8217;s a light that gives off magical properties.  It protects certain people, heals certain people, and turns certain people into living smoke.</p>
<p>I remember an interview back in season one where the producers said that they would always have  a scientific base.  I believed it, and I preached it for a while.  But Arthur C. Clarke said that &#8220;any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.&#8221;  Maybe it&#8217;s some form of electromagnetism.  Or maybe the same aliens that built Mayan pyramids set up the Island as some form of experiment.</p>
<p>Because, at the end of the day, it doesn&#8217;t matter.  I listened to the Official Lost Podcast, and the writers basically told the fans that, if they wanted some big explanatory scene, they needed to go watch <em>The Matrix Reloaded</em>.  In that movie, the Architect (Jacob?) tells Neo (Jack?) the truth behind the Matrix.  And instead of answering everyone&#8217;s questions and leaving them wowed, it&#8217;s regularly made fun of.  The Matrix sequels are constantly ridiculed.  Is that really what you wanted from LOST?</p>
<p>I tried to ask people, going into the finale, what questions needed to be answered by the finale to be considered a success.  The flash sideways question seemed to be the big one, and that was answered.</p>
<p>Another one seems to be about the pregnancy topic.  I&#8217;m not entirely sure how people anticipated that question would be answered in the finale (was the Monster going to tell us all about fertility issues?), but I have a relatively easy explanation for it.  Mother basically said that people don&#8217;t belong on this Island.  That man would continue to accidentally land there, but that it would have to be by accident.</p>
<p>The Island is invisible to modern technology to keep man away.  Wouldn&#8217;t it also have some sort of defense against the people that decide to live there?  And that&#8217;s where the pregnancies come in &#8211; if you try to have kids on the Island, you can&#8217;t.  The Island doesn&#8217;t let you.  If you bring a kid, it can&#8217;t stop it from being born, but it won&#8217;t let you conceive on-Island.</p>
<p>I think that explanation makes a lot of sense &#8211; would that answer have made the finale any better for anyone?</p>
<p>At the end of the day, the finale did for me everything that it needed to do.  I secretly hoped that John Locke would find redemption in some way.  His character is tortured in every way up until he reached the Island.  And when he finally made it to the Island, he gave everything to it &#8211; only to have his image stolen and used by the Monster.  And Locke died the way he lived &#8211; completely betrayed by someone that he thought loved him.</p>
<p>And when Locke smiled as he walked into that church, you knew it was okay.  That despite all that had happened to him, Locke was at peace with everything that had happened.  And despite all the hardships, you get the sense that he wouldn&#8217;t done it all the same way if he&#8217;d been given another chance.  That, despite knowing the truth, he still would&#8217;ve believed in something greater.  And that&#8217;s just really cool.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s Ben, the man we all love to hate.  The flash sideways showed that he was a good man at heart, and as he sat outside the church, afraid to go inside, he begged John for forgiveness.  And John, in a way only he could, smiled and let Ben off the hook.  And Ben was humbled by it.  Particularly when we find out that, as the final scene takes place in Infinity (or &#8220;out of time&#8221;), that Ben has probably had dozens of years to think about all the mistakes he&#8217;s made.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s Hurley, who after years of ridicule and following, gets the chance to be the leader he believes he can be.  The soul of the group (and of the show) is given the most important role on the Island, and it just feels so right.  I loved when Hurley saved the day in the season three finale, and I was so happy for him in the finale.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s Sawyer, the man who just couldn&#8217;t seem to get off the damn Island.  And after years of trying, he finally gets his wish.  Kate, torn between Jack and Sawyer for the entirety of the show, chooses Jack, only to leave the Island with Sawyer.  Claire is finally able to accept herself and move towards finally embracing her role as Aaron&#8217;s mother.</p>
<p>There are the characters of Richard, Lapidus, and Miles.  Afterthoughts to some people but important characters in their own right.  Miles and Lapidus were comedic characters who we cheered for.  And Richard, who I feared died last week, got to leave the Island with his first real love of life in a long time.</p>
<p>A lot of people will argue, even if you love the characters, that the show short-changed us.  That we never even got to see the Ajira plane leave the Island.  We didn&#8217;t get to see Claire and Aaron reunited.</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s because of Jack Shephard.  At the end of the day, <em>LOST </em>is about Jack.  Plain and simple.  The end.</p>
<p>The show started with him.  He received the most flashbacks of any character.  He was the first to be seen in a flashforward.  And he was the first to be seen in the flash sideways universe.  Of all the off-Island connections, Jack seemed to be the most inter-twined.  In a truly ensemble cast, Jack Shephard was the star.  It started with him, and it ended the same place.</p>
<p>It started with Jack lying next to Vincent following a plane crash.  It ends with him lying next to Vincent following a plane taking off.  It&#8217;s the kind of cyclical story that I assume <em>LOST </em>would do.  And the kind of symmetrical beauty that I expected to get from it.</p>
<p>Jack, who started off as the man of science and ended up as the man of faith.  The man who spent so many years trying to please his father only to see the man die before he ever got any true acceptance.  It&#8217;s no coincidence that Jack&#8217;s life truly began when Christian died, and it&#8217;s no coincidence that Jack found no life off-Island without his father.  It felt strange to see Jack emulating John Locke these last couple of seasons, but it makes sense.  More than anybody, the Island was drawing Jack close.  Jack was always afraid to admit it, but he was happy on the Island.  And it was only in the last couple of years that he truly realized it.</p>
<p>And, in the end, Jack died a hero.  And, in a way, he also died alone.  If I might steal one of his catchphrases.</p>
<p>And that final scene at the church was all about Jack.  The survivors of Oceanic 815 realized that the best part of their lives was on the Island with each other.  Together.  And even their &#8220;happy&#8221; lives were interrupted by the idea that they could be reunited with these people one more time.</p>
<p>You might ask why more people weren&#8217;t at the church.  Why didn&#8217;t Miles or Daniel show up at the church?  Why didn&#8217;t Ben go inside?  Where was Richard or Lapidus?</p>
<p>And my answer is that they didn&#8217;t belong there.  Richard was with his wife.  Daniel and Miles were with their families.  Lapidus was doing whatever it is that he did.  These people had loved ones in their lives that mattered to them.</p>
<p>But Jacob&#8217;s whole point in bringing Oceanic 815 to the Island was that these people only had each other.  None of their family bonds were strong enough to matter.  At the end of the day, they had each other and no one else.  And if they were going to move on to the next phase of existence, it was going to be as one big family.</p>
<p>And Christian explained everything perfectly &#8211; it all happened.  Everything on the Island was real.  And, yes, everyone in the church was dead &#8211; but they all died at different times.  Hurley died after years on the Island.  Kate and Sawyer probably died years after lives off-Island.  That&#8217;s why Jack (who died in season six) was able to visit with Boone, who died three years earlier.  They all died at different times but showed up to the church together.</p>
<p>And they were all happy there.  Despite all the pain and heartache, they all ended up happy.  The ones who died and the ones who made it, all together.</p>
<p>If you loved the characters, it was a great moment.  If you didn&#8217;t, it was either sappy or boring.  Either way, I hope you enjoyed the finale as much as I did.  And I hope you enjoyed the series as much as I did.  This was a show that brought so much joy to my life, and I&#8217;m truly going to miss it.  I have all of the seasons on DVD, and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll be buying the whole series on Blu-Ray soon enough.  People argue that the show has little re-watching possibilities, but I disagree.  I look forward to watching it all again, looking for Easter eggs as I go through.</p>
<p>If you watched the show for the characters, go back and try to find the answers you might have missed.  And if you watched for answers, try to watch for the characters.  The show kept a delicate balance, and I thought they finished off about as well as possible.</p>
<p>There will always be more questions.  But if a series can get you to love the characters, I think it&#8217;s done it&#8217;s job.  And, to me, that&#8217;s what <em>LOST </em>was always truly about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/25/lost-6x1718-the-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Requiem to Lost</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/24/a-requiem-to-lost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/24/a-requiem-to-lost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>forst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when Lost was about a bunch of people on an island? When it was about a paraplegic who suddenly discovered he could walk? A mysterious group with an equally mysterious number of mysterious stations? A drug addict trying to redeem himself? A doctor who believed survival depended on living together? A man willing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when <em>Lost</em> was about a bunch of people on an island?  When it was about a paraplegic who suddenly discovered he could walk?  A mysterious group with an equally mysterious number of mysterious stations?  A drug addict trying to redeem himself?  A doctor who believed survival depended on living together?  A man willing to do anything to protect his son?  A button that needed to be pushed every 108 minutes?  A cloud of black smoke that came and went as it pleased, wreaking havoc?  A statue with four toes?  A polar bear wildly out of its element?</p>
<p>What happened to that show?</p>
<p>Watching the series finale of <em>Lost</em> last night I was reminded of how much the show has changed in the six years since it premiered.  The puzzles and confusion of those first few seasons now seem somehow quaint.  Wondering about the function of the DHARMA stations?  Questioning what pushing the button every 108 would actually accomplish?  Arguing about the meaning of the Numbers?  That&#8217;s nothing compared to the epic battle between Jacob and that other guy who always dressed in black over control of the golden river at the center of the island.</p>
<p><em>Lost</em> fundamentally changed at the end of Season Three when the flashbacks became flash-forwards and then again when the flash-forwards became flash sideways (flashes sideways?) at the start of Season Six, and perhaps not for the better.  I recall, back when Season Three was at its most frustrating, thinking about how neat it would be if someone took all the scenes on the island from Season One and edited them together.  Minus the flashbacks, would <em>Lost</em> still work?  Would it still have dramatic heft?</p>
<p>Now that the show is over, the mysteries solved and the questions, for better or worse, answered, I find myself thinking about the simpler times when watching <em>Lost</em> was about the DHARMA Initiative, the Others and the Numbers.  It seems strange to think of <em>Lost</em> as simple but part of me longs for the days when the Blast Door map led to a few answers but so many new questions before the introduction of an overarching (and perhaps retroactive) theme of good versus evil and the epic/eternal struggle between Jacob and that other guy.</p>
<p>At the same time, <em>Lost</em> has always had its fantastical elements, so quibbling about the so-called &#8220;Heart of the Island&#8221; and its bright, golden light might appear trivial.  Maybe it has to do with the passage of time or maybe I&#8217;ve just become tired over the years.  But you can&#8217;t tell me that those first few seasons, when the mysteries of <em>Lost</em> were fresh and exciting, weren&#8217;t somehow better or at the very least more exciting than later seasons.  (You also can&#8217;t tell me that the producers/writers had the show planned out from the beginning, but that&#8217;s neither here nor there.  Much like the final moments of the finale, in fact.)</p>
<p><em>Lost</em> is over now. It&#8217;s been a thrilling ride, one filled with equal parts excitement and irritation.  I was never the biggest or most involved fan.  I never participated in any of the alternate reality games.  I read some magazine articles, talked about the show at a few message boards, chatted with friends and family about the most recent episode.  There&#8217;s no use wondering now what might have been.  What&#8217;s through the looking glass, so to speak.  No real use, that is, but I&#8217;m sure fans will spend the summer arguing about how the show ended and then, when the new television season starts in the fall, lament the fact that <em>Lost</em> won&#8217;t be coming back.</p>
<p>Personally, while I don&#8217;t really understand what the finale meant, I can&#8217;t say it wasn&#8217;t enjoyable.  I also can&#8217;t say I plan on rewatching all six seasons any time soon.  I actually don&#8217;t know how much repeat value the show will have, knowing how the show ends and knowing that so many questions remain unanswered.  Maybe I&#8217;ll just watch the first few seasons and try to forget the ending.  For me, <em>Lost</em> was at its best when it was about a bunch of people on an island, with a few strange twists thrown in for good measure.</p>
<p>I still want to know why that statue had only four toes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/24/a-requiem-to-lost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost Ends Tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/23/lost-ends-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/23/lost-ends-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>forst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If for some reason you&#8217;re unaware of tonight&#8217;s significance, ABC&#8217;s Lost will be wrapping up after six seasons and 121 episodes. The fun starts at 7PM when one last recap special, &#8220;Lost: The Final Journey,&#8221; begins. At 9PM, the two-and-a-half-hour series finale, aptly titled &#8220;The End,&#8221; starts. It, and the show that so many have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If for some reason you&#8217;re unaware of tonight&#8217;s significance, ABC&#8217;s <em>Lost</em> will be wrapping up after six seasons and 121 episodes.  The fun starts at 7PM when one last recap special, &#8220;Lost: The Final Journey,&#8221; begins.  At 9PM, the two-and-a-half-hour series finale, aptly titled &#8220;The End,&#8221; starts.  It, and the show that so many have invested so much in watching, comes to an end at 11:30PM.  But wait!  There&#8217;s more.  At 12:05AM a very special installment of <em>Jimmy Kimmel Live</em> called &#8220;Aloha Lost&#8221; will feature cast members Naveen Andrews, Nestor Carbonell, Alan Dale, Jeremy Davies, Emilie de Ravin, Michael Emerson, Matthew Fox, Daniel Dae Kim, Terry O’Quinn and Harold Perrineau, with special appearances by Jorge Garcia, Josh Holloway and Evangeline Lilly and an exclusive look at THREE ALTERNATIVE FINAL SCENES from the minds of executive producers Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t feel like staying up that late, the THREE ALTERNATE FINAL SCENES will probably be on YouTube by 1:06AM, a minute after <em>Jimmy Kimmel Live</em> ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/23/lost-ends-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOST &#8211; 6&#215;16 &#8211; &#8220;What They Died For&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/22/lost-6x16-what-they-died-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/22/lost-6x16-what-they-died-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 04:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And there you have it.  After six years, the last &#8220;regular&#8221; episode of LOST is in the books. And after six years of questions have been raised on the show, a lot of people have been concerned that the answers wouldn&#8217;t be coming.  But with only the two and a half hour finale remaining, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there you have it.  After six years, the last &#8220;regular&#8221; episode of <em>LOST </em>is in the books. And after six years of questions have been raised on the show, a lot of people have been concerned that the answers wouldn&#8217;t be coming.  But with only the two and a half hour finale remaining, I can honestly say that there aren&#8217;t many questions left to answer.  There&#8217;s still a whole lot to look forward to, though.</p>
<p><span id="more-2814"></span>On the message board here at Lowerdecks.com, I posted a question asking what questions were left unanswered going into the finale.  The big question seems to be &#8220;what is the significance of the flash-sideways universe?&#8221;  In addition to that, there&#8217;s still the question of how Desmond fits into everything &#8211; he&#8217;s been referenced as being able to destroy the Monster and also destroy the Island.  We&#8217;re also still not sure who David Shephard&#8217;s mother is, but I&#8217;m still fairly confident that it&#8217;s Juliet.</p>
<p>And outside of that, we already have a lot of the big answers.  What is the Monster?  Answered.  Who are Adam and Eve?  Answered.  Why was Oceanic 815 brought to the Island?   Answered.  Who is Jacob and why is he special?  Answered.</p>
<p>We even have a relatively vague answer to the question of &#8220;why is the Island so special?&#8221;  A lot of people might not like the &#8220;magical light&#8221; reasoning behind the Island&#8217;s significance, but I think it makes sense.  A while back, the writers and producers of the show promised a scientific explanation for everything that happens on the show, and they still have the &#8220;electromagnetism&#8221; card in their deck that they could play.  But as far as all that goes, I&#8217;m willing to forgive them for a couple of things.  The show has been about &#8220;science vs. faith&#8221; since the very beginning, and I&#8217;m okay giving &#8220;faith&#8221; a chance.</p>
<p>The big question answered in this one is by Jacob, who finally explains to the remaining 815 survivors why they were brought to the Island in the first place.  It&#8217;s been a long time coming, and I thought it was a great explanation.  For three years, the show gave us insight into these people&#8217;s lives, and Jacob is exactly right.  All of the people that we&#8217;ve met from Oceanic 815 were broken people before the Island.  All of them were tortured by their pasts &#8211; Jack had his daddy issues, Sawyer was consumed by revenge, Hurley was saddened by the infamous deck collapse, and Kate was running from her big crime.</p>
<p>But what I loved was the idea that they needed the Island as much as the Island needed them.  And if you think about it, Jacob was right about that too.  Jack, Kate, Sawyer, and Hurley are all better people because of the Island &#8211; Jack has become a confident leader, Kate has escaped her past, Sawyer is a better person after (literally) killing his demons, and Hurley conquered his inner demons.  Even the unlucky people who died were better off at the time of their deaths.  Charlie died a hero saving Claire &#8211; combining two of the greatest moments of his life.  Sayid was able to redeem himself with his sacrifice.  And Sun and Jin, after a very troubled marriage, decided that they&#8217;d rather die together than live apart ever again.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s odd that Jacob suddenly was able to show up to the rest of the survivors, though.  I think we&#8217;re supposed to assume that it had something to do with &#8220;young Jacob&#8221; took the ashes and threw them into that fire.  Like with the Island, we might have to file this under &#8220;magic&#8221; &#8211; but it&#8217;s odd that Jacob was able to present himself to everyone.  Because, outside of the inability to age or die of natural causes, Jacob has been confined within the boundaries of being human.  And appearing to Hurley has been a part of that.</p>
<p>But Jacob appearing to everyone seemed a bit strange, and the idea that he&#8217;d just show up at a campfire and explain everything to Jack and company seemed a bit easy.  That being said, I can&#8217;t think of another way that they could have done it.  We needed an explanation, and we needed it from Jacob.  We didn&#8217;t need it from Jacob via Hurley as a translator.</p>
<p>And then Jack chooses to replace Jacob.  It wasn&#8217;t exactly a surprise, and I&#8217;m really glad that they got it out of the way before the finale.  It was a strange road for Jack, but it also makes a lot of sense.  Jack spent most of his life trying to impress his father, and now that his father is gone, he doesn&#8217;t have a lot of reason to live off the Island.  He was able to do a lot on the Island, and it&#8217;s probably where he&#8217;s been the happiest.  And if he can somehow convince Kate to stay with him, I think he&#8217;d argue that it&#8217;d be as close to Heaven as he could ever expect.</p>
<p>I thought the scene where Jack gets &#8220;crowned&#8221; as the new Jacob was odd.  Was he supposed to be turning the river water into wine, or was he simply blessing the water?  If it&#8217;s the former, it might be the most Christ-like move for Jacob.  And it&#8217;s been hard to tell if that&#8217;s something that they&#8217;re trying to stress or not.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s where they left us going into the finale.  Jack is now Jacob, Jacob is now gone, and the three remaining characters are almost left with nothing to do.  They&#8217;re no longer candidates, and it&#8217;s hard to tell if they are still protected from the Monster (if, indeed, they ever were &#8211; another potential question).  Other than helping Jack or just getting in the way, I&#8217;m not sure what role they play going into the finale.  I expect that we might lose a couple of them, unfortunately.</p>
<p>On the other side of the Island, we finally find out what happened to Richard, Ben, and Miles.  They arrive at the Barracks to get explosives, but they&#8217;re immediately met by Charles Widmore and Zoe.  Widmore suggests that they team up, but Ben doesn&#8217;t want anything of it.  Widmore hides in Ben&#8217;s house, Miles runs off into the jungle alone, and Ben and Richard decide to try to talk to the LockeMonster as he arrives.</p>
<p>Richard decides that he will talk to Locke first, since he knows that he&#8217;s always wanted Richard on his side.  What Richard doesn&#8217;t know, unfortunately, is that the Monster isn&#8217;t in the business of recruiting people anymore.  While in smoke form, he swiftly grabs Richard and smashes him against the tree.</p>
<p>Is Richard dead?  It&#8217;s hard to say.  I would like to think that, if Richard is going to die, he deserves a better death than that.  And, like with the candidates, we don&#8217;t even know if the Monster is capable of killing Richard (who was also touched by Jacob).  That all being said, it doesn&#8217;t look good for Richard &#8211; who was never mentioned or referenced after the Monster threw him into the jungle.  I would bet that he&#8217;s dead, but I&#8217;m hoping that he survived the attack and makes one final heroic appearance.</p>
<p>Then the Monster decides to talk to Ben, who immediately gives away Widmore&#8217;s location.  Locke walks into the secret room and kills Zoe to prove that he&#8217;s not messing around.  The Monster wants to know why Widmore came back, and he promises to kill Penny if Widmore doesn&#8217;t tell him.  Widmore explains that Jacob had invited him back to the Island, and he was told to bring Desmond back with him.  Desmond is Jacob&#8217;s &#8220;fail-safe&#8221; plan in case everything else fails.</p>
<p>And, before Widmore can say anything else, Ben shoots and kills him &#8211; finally getting his revenge for the death of Alex.</p>
<p>When it first happened, I thought it was strange that Ben was evil again.  He&#8217;d spent the last few years trying to prove that he&#8217;s not a bad guy, and he&#8217;s made a lot of effort to help out the group.  But, at the same time, he&#8217;s a survivalist, and he&#8217;s always much more concerned with his own life than the lives of others.</p>
<p>Also, as Ben arrived at the Barracks, Miles came across Alex&#8217;s body.  I think the feelings of watching Alex die all came back, and Ben simply decided to side with the Monster to side against Widmore.  And, now, Ben&#8217;s simply doing what he needs to do to survive.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s just a lot of fun when Ben is the villain.  He&#8217;s a guy you love and hate at the same time, and I firmly believe he&#8217;s one of the greatest characters in television history.  Michael Emerson is such a great actor, and it was such an amazing find for <em>LOST </em>to get him in the first place.  Without Emerson or Ben, this show wouldn&#8217;t be nearly as great as it is.</p>
<p>And so Ben and the Monster, having killed almost everyone at the Barracks, decide to try and find Jacob&#8217;s &#8220;fail-safe&#8221; &#8211; only to find that he&#8217;s already been rescued from the well.  But the Monster doesn&#8217;t seem concerned, especially when he reveals that he wants to destroy the Island once and for all.  And, like I said earlier, he seems to think that Desmond will be able to help with that goal.</p>
<p>Over in the flash sideways universe, Ben has a run-in with Desmond when Mr. Hume shows back up at the school.  Desmond beats Ben up, but it all seems to be a message to Locke.  Desmond tells Locke that he needs to &#8220;let go&#8221; &#8211; and that&#8217;s exactly what Jack told Locke to do at the hospital.  Alt-Locke&#8217;s &#8220;fate sense&#8221; kicks in, and he decides to let Jack perform the surgery on him.</p>
<p>Elsewhere, Ben comes across Alex, and he&#8217;s introduced to Danielle.  The crazy French lady doesn&#8217;t seem as crazy off-Island, and she invites Ben over for dinner.  She offers up one of the best lines of the show, telling Ben that they&#8217;ll kidnap him to bring him to dinner if they have to &#8211; a funny revelation considering the on-Island connection between Ben and Rousseau.  And, by the end of dinner, it seems that Ben and Danielle have hit it off.  A cute couple, but it&#8217;s definitely odd to think about considering their on-Island history.</p>
<p>At the police station, Desmond turns himself in (for the assault of Ben and the hit-and-run on Locke) to get himself thrown in the same prison transport as Kate and Sayid.  Desmond pays off a cop (Ana-Lucia in a guest spot) to let them off at a dock, and Hurley assists in the escape.  He agrees to take Sayid, and Desmond offers Kate a dress to go to a concert.</p>
<p>The concert seems to be the key to everything.  This seems to be the same benefit concert that Desmond was helping to plan in the first place, and we already know that Daniel, Charlotte, Eloise, and Charles Widmore will be there.  Miles has been invited because of his father, and he&#8217;s already agreed to take Sawyer.  Jack and David are going to go, along with David&#8217;s mysterious mother.  With Desmond and Kate also going, you have to think that something big is going to happen at the concert.  Maybe getting all of these people back in the same place is going to set off some kind of event that affects both universes.</p>
<p>I also thought it was cool that Hurley was able to recognize Ana-Lucia &#8211; which makes you wonder how much Hurley is able to remember of the other universe.  Does he remember everything?  Does Desmond?  Because Charlie seemed to be the first one with his eyes truly open, but he didn&#8217;t seem to have the ability to remember everything.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m pretty confident that everything about the flash-sideways universe will be explained, and I&#8217;m almost certain that it will have something to do with the endgame.  Desmond is extremely important in both universes, and he&#8217;s the only one that (seemingly) traveled between the universes.  Or, at least, his consciousness did.</p>
<p>So there we are.  On-Island, almost everyone is dead.  The Monster and Ben are competing with Jack&#8217;s group to find Desmond.  Claire and Miles are somewhere in the jungle, and let&#8217;s not forget about Rose and Bernard&#8230;who are still somewhere out there, enjoying their &#8220;retirement.&#8221;  It would certainly be funny if they played some kind of part in the finale on-Island.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all coming together, and by Sunday night, it will all be over.  I&#8217;m definitely going to be sad when it&#8217;s over, but it will also be nice to know everything.  I can&#8217;t believe that the finale is almost here, but it&#8217;s certainly been one Hell of a ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/22/lost-6x16-what-they-died-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fringe 2&#215;23 &#8220;Over There, Part 2&#8243; review</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/21/fringe-2x23-over-there-part-2-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/21/fringe-2x23-over-there-part-2-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 20:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Waterloo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fringe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following contains spoilers through the episode “Over There, Part 2,” originally broadcast 5/20/10. It’s funny. This season on ‘Lost’ there’s been a pretty significant presence of an alternate reality. In Star Trek, there was always the Mirror Universe, which at least in ‘Deep Space Nine’ became a recurring place to visit and watch develop. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The following contains spoilers through the episode “Over There, Part 2,” originally broadcast 5/20/10.</strong></p>
<p>It’s funny.  This season on ‘Lost’ there’s been a pretty significant presence of an alternate reality.  In Star Trek, there was always the Mirror Universe, which at least in ‘Deep Space Nine’ became a recurring place to visit and watch develop.  But even in a show like ‘Sliders,’ which is probably one of the most prominent examples of a TV show employing this gimmick, I can’t imagine it ever being as important as it has become on ‘Fringe.’  As the second season concludes, you can find no more dramatic exploration of just how much.</p>
<p><span id="more-2811"></span></p>
<p>The conclusion of the two-part episode begins with a brief tour of some of the superficial differences, which is much of what we’ve gotten to this point about the alternate reality.  From there, we expand further, into some of the ways the alternate versions of familiar characters differ, which in itself can help to define and illuminate both the people we know, and those we’re just meeting.  (Our) Olivia is defined as someone who’s always reacting against some sort of personal pain; or in other words, haunted, and that fits her just as well as how Walter defined her during the “musical” episode, “Brown Betty.”</p>
<p>Of course, one of the big things about the episode is the reunion between Walter and William Bell (Leonard Nimoy), which in some ways has been as long-in-coming as Peter learning that he comes from the alternate reality.  The relationship between Walter and Bell has been a part of the mythology, the backstory, from the start, and to finally see it in action again is pretty huge.  Nimoy and John Noble don’t disappoint, either, acting out their scenes together as old friends who are particularly reluctant to see each other again, with a little too much history and bitterness between them for any real enjoyment to flow from it.  Bell formed Massive Dynamic in our reality while Walter was suffering in an institution, and then escaped into the alternate reality, which he likes to point out was just as necessary as Walter’s need to “rescue” his son, an event, the crossing between universes (which they’d both wanted to exploit in the past, but not like this), that started the series arc.</p>
<p>Olivia ends up basically declaring her love for Peter to try and win him back to our reality, which is another development somewhat long in coming.  Unlike most shows whose lead characters end up in romantic relationships after years of platonic interactions, there hasn’t been a lot of teasing, which has both made it seem like they weren’t going to do it and perhaps more natural than previous examples, which ended up building most of their appeal and thus inevitable viewer disappointment on its culmination.</p>
<p>Considering that the show has used Nimoy so sparingly, these past two episodes are the most we’ve ever seen Bell, and so it’s been as much the mystique of having Nimoy around as the history Bell helps establish with Walter.  It’s funny, because even in these episodes, Nimoy is used sparingly, but he still comes across pretty powerfully, because the show seems to know exactly how to use him.  To our heroes, he’s as much as legendary, but to the alternate Olivia and Charlie Francis, he’s a complete unknown, even though he carries weight in that reality as a friend of Walternate’s.  We’ve already been told that he’s crossed between worlds too often, and that it’s made his molecules unstable, so it makes a pretty appropriate sacrifice, but still an effective one, when he serves as the catalyst to get our heroes back home, including Peter.</p>
<p>Perhaps the truly remarkable thing about the episode is how subtle it treats the reunion of Peter and Walter, which demonstrates a considerable amount of restraint.  Peter doesn’t forgive Walter so much as decide that he might be able to see things his way, which is probably more appropriate.  How long have we waited for people to not just accept Walter as he is but to understand him, too?</p>
<p>But as curveballs go, it’s the ending that has to take the cake.  ‘Fringe’ loves curveballs, and especially to end episodes with them.  In the past, this has been done to redeem week episodes, but here it’s a way to conclude the season exactly as it began: with an infiltrator (it’s worth noting that Bell created the shape-shifter technology, which is not the method this time, but rather the alternate Olivia).  With Olivia once more trapped on the other side, it becomes that much more of an impetus next season to raise the stakes further, which for a show like this is exactly what you want.  But I guess we have to wait a few months…</p>
<p>To round out the review, it might be worth noting, as I anticipated back in February for my review of “Jacksonville” (before the rest of the season was available for final listings), that I was correct in assuming that the numbers Walter stumbled across but couldn’t remember the significance of, that happened to correspond at least in theory of a date for a future ‘Fringe’ episode, turned out to be pretty accurate, and it was of course this very season finale.  It’s another example, because this wasn’t specifically brought up in the episode (though Walter does at one point complain to Bell about his memory problems, part of a litany of perceived grievances that didn’t seem to find correspondence with his old friend), of how subtle the show can be.  In hindsight at this point, the significance of the numbers might refer to the trip to the other side, or the recovery of Peter, or maybe the alternate Olivia’s infiltration.  I’m sure we’ll find out more later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/21/fringe-2x23-over-there-part-2-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS Cancels Ghost Whisperer; ABC May Pick It Up</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/20/cbs-cancels-ghost-whisperer-abc-may-pick-it-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/20/cbs-cancels-ghost-whisperer-abc-may-pick-it-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 01:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>forst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ghost Whisperer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, CBS announced it had canceled Ghost Whisperer after five seasons, along with Cold Case, The New Adventures of Old Christine, Gary Unmarried, NUMB3RS, Miami Medical and Accidentally on Purpose. While some of the cancellations, especially NUMB3RS, were expected, the cancellation of Ghost Whisperer was surprising. Deadline Hollywood reports that talks between production company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, CBS announced <a href="http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news/2010/05/18/ghost-whisperer-cold-case-christine-out-in-pre-upfront-purge/8689/">it had canceled <em>Ghost Whisperer</em></a> after five seasons, along with <em>Cold Case</em>, <em>The New Adventures of Old Christine</em>, <em>Gary Unmarried</em>, <em>NUMB3RS</em>, <em>Miami Medical</em> and <em>Accidentally on Purpose</em>.  While some of the cancellations, especially <em>NUMB3RS</em>, were expected, the cancellation of <em>Ghost Whisperer</em> was surprising.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.deadline.com/2010/05/would-abc-pick-up-old-christine-and-the-ghost-whisperer/">Deadline Hollywood</a> reports that talks between production company ABC Studios and ABC the network to pick up <em>Ghost Whisperer</em> are underway and things are looking good.Last season, CBS picked up <em>Medium</em> after NBC canceled it while ABC picked up <em>Scrubs</em> after NBC canceled it as well.</p>
<p>What do you think?  Should ABC pick up <em>Ghost Whisperer</em> for a sixth season?  The fifth season finale airs tomorrow and it seems highly unlikely that any lingering storylines will be wrapped up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/20/cbs-cancels-ghost-whisperer-abc-may-pick-it-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOST &#8211; 6&#215;15 &#8211; &#8220;Across the Sea&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/15/lost-across-the-sea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/15/lost-across-the-sea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 04:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Related]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowerdecks.com/?p=2797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What kind of show would make an episode where absolutely zero main characters appear in any new footage?  Where the main plot takes place entirely in a period thousands of years before any of us were even born?  What kind of show formally introduces characters that are immensely tied to the mythos with only three [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of show would make an episode where absolutely zero main characters appear in any new footage?  Where the main plot takes place entirely in a period thousands of years before any of us were even born?  What kind of show formally introduces characters that are immensely tied to the mythos with only three (and a half) hours left in the show?  If you answered &#8220;<em>LOST</em>&#8221; &#8211; you&#8217;re absolutely correct.  And I think <em>LOST</em> might be the only show that could get away with such a thing.</p>
<p><span id="more-2797"></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with the thing that everyone seems to be talking about &#8211; what is the Man in Black&#8217;s true name?  It&#8217;s something that&#8217;s bothered people since he was introduced (and not named) in the season five finale.  He&#8217;s been called Jacob&#8217;s Enemy, the Man in Black, MiB, the Monster, the LockeMonster, and a handful of other monikers.  And we all assumed that, since we were going to get an entire episode devoted to Jacob and his apparent brother, we&#8217;d learn the guy&#8217;s name once and for all.</p>
<p>Nope.  In a way that only <em>LOST</em> seems to be able to do, we never learn his name.  In a way of teasing the fans, Jacob and MiB&#8217;s mother claims that she only came up with one name (Jacob) and doesn&#8217;t name the other baby.  And when the Mother character (also unnamed and played by <em>West Wing</em> alumna Allison Janney) kills Claudia (their biological mother), any chance of getting a name seemed to fly out the window.</p>
<p>The explanation that seems to be coming out of this is that the Man in Black simply doesn&#8217;t have a name.  It seems strange, but we&#8217;re talking about an Island where only three people exist.  There&#8217;s simply &#8220;Jacob&#8221; and the other boy.  It&#8217;s not like there would be a lot of pronounal confusion going on, especially since they all seemed, as they were growing up, that they were the only humans in existence.</p>
<p>Now would he have been given a name while he was living in that civilization?  Probably.  But the writers decided not to tell us, and I&#8217;m guessing they&#8217;re never going to tell us.  And, honestly, if &#8220;what is the Monster&#8217;s name?&#8221; is the biggest question that is left unanswered, I think we&#8217;ll be in great shape in two weeks.</p>
<p>That all being said, we did get a lot of stuff answered.  Let&#8217;s break it all down.</p>
<p><strong>Is Jacob human?  Was the Monster human?</strong></p>
<p>The answer to both questions is an obvious yes.  Jacob is in charge of the Island simply because he was born in the right place at the right time.  He&#8217;s not omnipotent or omnipresent, and he seems to simply be ageless as much as Richard was.  This power seems to have come from his mother, and considering what&#8217;s happened, she can only assumed to be human too.  After all, both were killed relatively easily (and in the same way).</p>
<p>The Monster was also human, but that question is a bit trickier.  We know that Jacob killed his brother by throwing him into that mysterious cave (more on that in a moment).  And we know that as soon as he fell into the light, the Smoke Monster emerged from the cave.</p>
<p>However, we aren&#8217;t really able to put two and two together to say that Jacob&#8217;s brother is the Monster.  I know we&#8217;re asking more questions in the answer, but we can&#8217;t say that definitively.  Because we know that the Monster is capable of mimicking the dead &#8211; how do we know that the Monster is regaining his old form and not simply choosing the right form to fight against the Island&#8217;s protector?  He&#8217;s done it before by mimicking John Locke &#8211; he does whatever he needs to do to escape.</p>
<p>Maybe the Monster is a completely different entity that simply escaped when Jacob&#8217;s brother was thrown into the cave.  Of course, maybe they&#8217;re the same creature.  There&#8217;s really no way of saying one way or the other is right at this point.</p>
<p>With <em>LOST</em>, every answer brings another question.  Mother was right.</p>
<p><strong>Who are Adam and Eve?</strong></p>
<p>This one is a pretty big one.  Adam and Eve were forgotten for most of the show, but they were always significant to the people that matter.  I read an interview once that said that Adam and Eve were clues that the writers threw into season one to let us know that they had a plan all along.  That, when it was all said and done, Adam and Eve would connect season one to season six.</p>
<p>And there were tons of theories that people had about them.  Even before time travel came to the Island, people assumed that Adam and Eve were Jack and Kate.  That they were Sun and Jin.  That they were Rose and Bernard.  These theories were played upon earlier this year when Hurley suggested that they might travel through time again and end up as Adam and Eve.</p>
<p>But, no.  Adam and Eve end up being the Monster and his mysterious adopted mother.  When we first saw them way back in season one, we wondered if we knew the identities of Adam and Eve.  Well, the answer is &#8220;yes&#8221; &#8211; although, it was also a lot more complicated than we originally thought.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s so special about this Island?</strong></p>
<p>This is another one that we &#8220;kinda&#8221; answer.  Apparently, the Island is the source of the &#8220;light&#8221; in the universe.  That it&#8217;s the source of life, death, and everything in between.  It all feels a little bit Star Wars-ish, and it turned off a lot of people who don&#8217;t like the supernatural side of <em>LOST</em>.</p>
<p>So apparently this light is very important and has to be protected &#8211; that explains the role of Jacob&#8217;s adopted mother, Jacob, and his eventual successor.  Why does it need to be protected?  Man&#8217;s greed of course.  And since men keep ending up on the Island accidentally, someone has to make sure they don&#8217;t try and steal it.</p>
<p>What do I think of that whole premise?  I think it makes a lot of sense, story-wise.  A magic light would certainly explain a lot of the crazy things that have happened on the Island, and the scientists can explain away the &#8220;magic&#8221; side with some kind of technobabble about electromagnetism.  At the end of  the day, I don&#8217;t think it really matters.  I was hoping that the show would lean a little more towards &#8220;science&#8221; than &#8220;faith&#8221; because I&#8217;d read an interview that said that all the crazy stuff on the Island could be explained scientifically.</p>
<p>But the whole show is based on the idea of science versus faith.  Why is it so bad that the show straddles the line between science and magic?  After all, someone once said that science, at a certain point, becomes indistinguishable from magic.</p>
<p>In addition to those questions, we still have a lot of questions&#8230;mainly stemming from the characterization of Jacob.  He&#8217;s not painted in the best of light here, as he&#8217;s a bit of a momma&#8217;s boy, and he has a heck of a temper.  He attacks his brother twice in the course of the episode, and he ends up killing his brother as an act of revenge.  Not exactly &#8220;godly&#8221; works from the perceived deity of the Island.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s odd is that the villain, the Monster, doesn&#8217;t fight back either time.  He seems to love his brother enough not to try and hurt him in any way.  Even when Jacob drags him to his death, the Monster never makes a move to fight back.  He does kill his adopted mother, but that&#8217;s about the only violent thing he does in the entire episode.  Most of the time, he&#8217;s simply trying to get home.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s Jacob&#8217;s view on people.  In the flashback, he seems to be anti-people.  His mother teaches him that people are trustworthy, and she even uses the same exact words that the Monster used to describe people in the season five finale.  It&#8217;s the brother who goes to live with people, although he has less-than-great things to say about them after living with them for a couple of decades.</p>
<p>And by the end of the episode, there&#8217;s not a whole lot that happens to change either of their minds.  The brother goes crazy when he finds his people slaughtered, but Jacob doesn&#8217;t really seem to care that their mother killed them all.  In fact, he makes almost no interaction with the people at all.</p>
<p>And, yet, years later, Jacob is bringing people to the Island with a huge faith in them, and it&#8217;s the Monster who kills most of them with no faith that they&#8217;re anything but violent monsters themselves.</p>
<p>What changed?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to say, and I&#8217;m not even sure we&#8217;ll get the answer.  Maybe he softened on people at some point between this episode and the arrival of the Black Rock.  It&#8217;s possible that, after a couple thousand years of people arriving on the Island, he realized that we&#8217;re not all that bad.  And I guess the Man in Black, after his transformation into the black smoke, started seeing the dark side of everyone and everything.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the last three and a half hours of the show will continue to delve into the motivations of both Jacob and the Monster.  But I think it&#8217;s safe to say that these aren&#8217;t your stereotypical depictions of good and evil.  Jacob is probably good, and the Monster is probably bad.  But I think they&#8217;re both capable of either &#8211; after all, they&#8217;re both human.</p>
<p>One of the things that kinda bothered me about the episode was the flashback to season one and the discovery of Adam and Eve.  This show has, for the most part, done a pretty good job of respecting the intelligence of the audience.  There have been hundreds of connections and continuity items that have been subtly done over the course of the series.  And, for the first time, the show really went out of its way to shove down our throats that these were the same Adam and Eve that we met.</p>
<p>And I just didn&#8217;t think that was necessary.  The people that remembered Adam and Eve on the show were almost certainly going to get it, and the people that didn&#8217;t remember probably wouldn&#8217;t have cared that much in the first place.  It just didn&#8217;t seem like <em>LOST</em>&#8216;s style to be so obvious, and it felt a bit out of place.</p>
<p>Although the nice little subtle stuff was the idea that Jacob and the Monster both lived in the caves when they were growing up.  So when the Monster drew Jack to the caves, he actually drew Jack to his own home.   And to his own body.   That&#8217;s a pretty cool little connection, and it continues to slightly alter what really happened way back in season one.</p>
<p>And there you have it.  A unique episode that really showcased Jacob and the Monster, just in time for the last true hour of the show.  I can&#8217;t believe that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s left, and it&#8217;s really starting to feel real now.  Pretty soon, it will all be over, and that&#8217;s honestly a really strange feeling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowerdecks.com/2010/05/15/lost-across-the-sea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
